|
Introduction Introduction Graduate students at research universities will shape the future of STEM undergraduate education in the United States. The graduate students trained at approximately 100 research universities will flow into the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculties of all undergraduate institutions, dispersing among more than 3,500 research universities, comprehensive universities, liberal arts colleges, and community colleges. Equally important, future STEM faculties will be increasingly engaged in all forms of STEM education for diverse audiences, including higher education, K-12 pre-service preparation, distance learning, and informal education. Thus, the graduate schools of research universities are a critical leverage point for national reform of STEM education. We propose to create a professional development program in teaching and learning that will prepare graduate students, and with them post-doctoral researchers and current faculty, to meet the future challenges of national STEM higher education. Our program will be designed to overcome the demonstrated resistance to education reform at research universities (Eiseman & Fairweather, 1996; Menges & Austin, 2001). This resistance derives in part from the perception of STEM faculty that the teaching process is orthogonal to the research process, and that research is more interesting and more valued (Fairweather, 1996; Massy, Wilger, & Colbeck 1994). We assert that successful development of STEM graduate students, post-doctoral researchers, and faculty as educators will be advanced by the combination of (a) a fundamental transformation in conceptualization of the process of teaching and (b) the creation of learning communities favorable toward that transformation.
Furthermore, development of graduates-through-faculty in teaching and learning will be best achieved in a collaborative environment that actively engages all participants, much like STEM laboratories and research teams. We will create graduate-through-faculty learning communities where growth in teaching skills occurs through collaborative relationships and activities and where the shared identity rests on values of learning, teaching, and professional development. Such learning communities have proven successful at aligning participants with institutional goals and values and developing the networks necessary for institutional change (Gabelnick, MacGregor, Matthews, & Smith, 1990; Shapiro & Levine, 1999). Moreover, successful learning communities recruit participants who are interested in but not yet committed to change.
|
|
CIRTL |
If you have questions, comments, or problems accessing these pages, please e-mail info@cirtl.net This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0227592 Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Copyright 2006, The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System |
|